| Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Range: |
|
||||
Christmas Is Gone -- In More Ways Than One ![]() March 2005 When your Editor was a kid in the 1950s, at Christmas time, he always heard the refrain, "Let's Put Christ Back in Christmas." Back then, Christmas had become commercialized and consumerized, and it's gotten much worse since then. Now the "Season's Greetings" displays often go up in the stores before Halloween.But at least back then, virtually everyone said "Merry Christmas." But nowadays to say that to someone you don't know to be a rather serious Christian is risky. Now people say "Happy Holidays" instead. We noticed that when President Bush, reputed to be the most religious president ever, spoke recently at a December news conference, he said "Happy Holidays" rather than "Merry Christmas," not once but three times. President Bush is a macho guy, but still he doesn't want to offend people needlessly. Yes, President Bush is willing to offend people -- a good sign in a politician -- but not with something so trivial, shall we say, as Merry Christmas. That even President Bush says "Happy Holidays" should tell us Christians about the sorry state of Christmas. On the other hand -- but not really -- there's a new A.M. radio station nationwide called Air America. It's hard Left. Every host we've heard is quite hostile to Christianity, but not to Islam or Judaism. They don't much like "conservative" Catholics, but they truly hate "fundamentalist" Protestants. (The worst offenders are the gentile hosts; the Jewish hosts tone it down a bit.) There are of course the usual station announcements, and in the month of December it was "Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year." Of course they didn't really mean have a Merry Christmas. It was really a clever taunt. That secular Lefties would mockingly say "Merry Christmas" is just another reminder of the sorry state of Christmas. But every other radio station says "Happy Holidays," as do the commercials. Businesses, above all, don't want to offend potential customers -- the Salvation Army was banned from Target stores -- and for many businesses it is the month of December that keeps them out of the red. Indeed, for our national economy, the month of December is usually make or break. So Happy Holidays has basically replaced Merry Christmas, which appears to be some kind of obscenity for many people. But does Happy Holidays really cut it? In mid-December, your Editor got a haircut. My barberette is Oriental. Did I wish her Happy Holidays? No. Did I wish her a Merry Christmas? No. Rather, I asked, "Are you a Christian?" She said, "No, I'm Buddhist." So I said, "I can't wish you Happy Holidays." She said, "That's right." I detected an inscrutable note of appreciation. In December on National Public Radio there was a commentary by a fellow -- identifying himself as a believing Christian -- who had an uncommon idea. Instead of trying fruitlessly to put Christ back into Christmas, he said, let's take Christ out of Christmas. Enough of this profanation. The capitalists have thoroughly colonized Christmas, so let it be the secular holiday it has already become. The fellow suggested that we put our religious energies into Easter. Maybe he has a point. That Christ was born in a manger is interesting, but that He died for the sins of those who believe in Him and that He rose physically from the dead is what Christianity is all about. As St. Paul said: "if Christ has not been raised, then your faith is useless, and you are still under condemnation for your sins" (1 Cor. 15:17). If we serious Christians want to take Christ out of "Christmas," what would happen? Would it be rough on the kids? Would it save Christian parents a whole bunch of stress and strain? Would it even save some marriages? Would Christians avoid the whirl of so-called Christmas parties? So shall we let them have their Winter Solstice, their Kwanzaa, or whatever? If we Christians take Christ out of "Christmas" -- basically forget all the "Holiday Greetings," as the Buddhists do -- we could avoid the merry-go-round atmosphere, but could we also slyly put Christ back into Christmas in our families? Or is that utterly utopian? In any case, let us put Christ into Annunciation Day -- March 25, exactly nine months before Christmas. Annunciation Day announces the Incarnation of Christ as well as the conception of Christ. It's interesting that Christ was born, but it's much more interesting that He was conceived, because it makes a statement that life begins at conception and that abortion is a heinous crime. Can we please build up this holy day? We can guarantee you that the capitalists and the multiculturalists won't come anywhere near Annunciation Day. |
||||
|
||||
|
December 26, 2007 Persistence paid off for Frances Burke, a senior resident of Bayside, New York. For many years, the Bayside Hills Civic Association refused Burke's request to include a nativity display in its annual holiday celebration which included a menorah and tree lighting ceremony at the public park. This year, however, Burke teamed up with the Thomas More Law Center, a national Christian public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, which seeks to restore public acknowledgment of the religious significance of Christmas. As a result, for the first time in its history, the Bayside Hills Civic Association prominently displayed a nativity scene as part of its holiday celebration. The Law Center was assisted in its endeavor on behalf of Burke by the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, which donated the nativity display, and New York Councilman Tony Avella, who assisted with obtaining the proper permits from the New York City Parks Department. Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel for the Law Center, commented, "Frances Burke's perseverance and willingness to fight for the nativity display and against the Civic Association's discriminatory practice is an example to all Christians. There is a clear and growing trend among municipalities, public schools and universities, major commercial establishments and corporations to secularize and even ignore the reason for celebrating Christmas - the birth of Christ. As long as groups like the ACLU exist, the War on Christmas will continue. The antidote to the ACLU is more Frances Burkes." Earlier in the Christmas season, the Thomas More Law Center armed its 500 pro bono attorneys with a legal memorandum on how to deal with local issues surrounding the celebration of Christmas by public entities. Each year the Thomas More Law Center handles scores of inquiries and disputes regarding the recognition and celebration of Christmas. Many of these cases, like the Burke case, are favorably resolved without recourse to court action. Robert Muise, the Thomas More Law Center attorney who handled Frances Burke's case stated, "A crèche depicts the historical origins of Christmas, which has long been recognized as a National Holiday. To exclude this one passive symbol from year-end holiday displays demonstrates hostility toward the Christian faith." The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through education, litigation, and related activities. It does not charge for its services. The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization. You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at http://www.thomasmore.org/. |
||||
|
||||
|
U.S. House Votes 372-9 to Pass Resolution Supporting Christmas and Christianity December 13, 2007
On Tuesday, the U.S. House passed a resolution recognizing the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith by a vote of 372 to 9. Nine members voted against the resolution, ten refused to support it by voting "present," and 40 others members did not vote. All but two of the representatives voting "present" or against the Christmas Resolution voted in favor of a resolution recognizing Ramadan, which passed by a 376-0 vote in October. The Ramadan Resolution stated that the House "recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world...expresses friendship and support for Muslims...acknowledges the onset of Ramadan...and conveys its respect to Muslims...rejects hatred, bigotry, and violence directed against Muslims...commends Muslims... who have privately and publicly rejected interpretations and movements of Islam that justify and encourage hatred, violence, and terror". The Christmas Resolution uses similar language, stating that the House recognizes "the Christian faith as one of the great religions of the world...expresses continued support for Christians...acknowledges the international religious and historical importance of Christmas and the Christian faith...acknowledges and supports the role played by Christians and Christianity in the founding of the United States and in the formation of the western civilization...rejects bigotry and persecution directed against Christians...and expresses its deepest respect to American Christians and Christians throughout the world". The nine members who voted against the Christmas Resolution were all Democrats: Ackerman (NY), Clarke (NY), DeGette (CO), Hastings (FL), Lee (CA), McDermott (WA), Scott (VA), Stark (CA) and Woolsey (CA). The 10 who answered "present" without entering a vote were also Democrats except one: Conyers (MI), Frank (MA), Holt (NJ), Payne (NJ), Pence (Republican from IN), Schakowsky (PA), Schwartz (PA), Wasserman-Schultz (FL), Welch (VT) and Yarmuth (KY). |
||||
|
||||
Poll: 1 in 8 Britons Know Christmas Story in Depth
A new survey by the public theology think thank Theos has found that only 12 percent of adults in Britain have detailed knowledge of the Christmas story. Sat, Dec. 08, 2007 Posted: 08:38:28 AM EST LONDON – A new survey by the public theology think thank Theos has found that only 12 percent of adults in Britain have detailed knowledge of the Christmas story. Maria Mackay |
||||
|
||||
'Naughty or Nice' List Advises Christians Where to Shop for Christmas
This Christmas season, whether a store greets you with “Happy Holidays” or “Merry Christmas” makes all the difference where you should do your shopping, says a Christian legal group. Wed, Nov. 14, 2007 Posted: 08:24:48 AM EST This Christmas season, whether a store greets you with “Happy Holidays” or “Merry Christmas” makes all the difference where you should do your shopping, says a Christian legal group. |
||||
|
||||
|
Supreme Court Won't Review Tuesday , February 20, 2007 The Supreme Court on Tuesday decided not to review a The nation's highest court chose not to re-examine an appeals court decision against the claim filed by Andrea Skoros, a Roman Catholic mother of two sons who attended public schools. She first filed the case in 2002 in Skoros had claimed that the city's policy promoted and endorsed the religions of Judaism and Islam and conveyed a message of disapproval toward Christianity. The 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded last year that no objective observer would believe it was the city's purpose to denigrate Christianity, even if the Department of Education erred in characterizing a Jewish menorah and an Islamic star and crescent as secular symbols. Instead, the court said, the actual and perceived purpose of the holiday display policy was to use holiday celebrations to encourage respect for the city's diverse cultural traditions. The policy affects more than one million students enrolled in 1,200 public schools and programs in the nation's largest public school system. City public school students speak 140 different languages and more than 125,000 students are enrolled in programs to learn English. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The war on Christmas, and Christ, is realTim Heffron Heffron lives in Roanoke. It's amazing that the rantings of a lunatic can be passed off as good media. It's even more amazing that the lunatic making the rantings claims to be doing it for good or even noble causes. Such are the rantings of that well-known, or maybe not-so-well-known editorial page editor of The Roanoke Times, Dan Radmacher. Okay, so that was unfair, but your condemnation of Bill O'Reilly is of the same vein ("Christmas bullies manufactured this 'war on Christmas,'" Dec. 17). No I do not agree that O'Reilly manufactured the war on Christmas. There is ample evidence of its existence, and your diatribe is just a small scuff on the surface. The war is plainly evident when stores block their employees from wishing Merry Christmas rather than allow the smallest possibility that shoppers be reminded the meaning of this season. The American holiday is not St. Nicholas or Santa Claus day; it's not the Kwanzaa season; it's not the Official Celebration of Winterfest; it is not the End of Year Shopping Extravaganza Sale Season! It is in fact the celebration of the birth of the savior of the world, Jesus Christ, true God and true man. We celebrate the birth of the Messiah, the Emanuel, the promised one of God, the King of Kings! That is the meaning of the season. Only a bigot would decry the well-wishes of Christians who want to herald his coming and include all men and women in their joy at his birth and the fulfillment of the promise of God. It is not insensitive to wish Merry Christmas any more than it is harmful and insensitive to wish someone a good day. It is wishing them happiness and a share in the joy of the season. Denying the right to say "Merry Christmas" is bigoted. I don't think it is harmful or insensitive if a Jewish person wishes me Happy Hanukkah, or a Muslim wishes happy Ramadan, or an atheist wishes me a good day. All are positive greetings and wishes. The war on Christians has not ceased since the appearance of Christ at his birth, and so you should feel you are doing nothing worse than Herod or the Pharisees did in persecuting Christ and his church. But at the same time, that is not what humanity is called to, is it? If you want to truly be progressive and open-minded, you should welcome the sharing of all cultures. In the great melting pot that America is supposed to be, it seems only radical liberals want to silence viewpoints. They claim openness, but their hypocrisy is astounding. You may not feel called to visit a church this Christmastime, but you should feel welcome to do so if you like. Similarly, I would hope you would feel open to share your deeply held beliefs with anyone around you. Denying that to others is truly a shameful act, and I would hope you might change your tone regarding Christians who love their faith and want to share their joy. Do not take it as an assault (though I know some zealous people do present it that way). Pope John Paul II used to say that "the Church proposes, it does not mandate." Faith to be true must be held in the heart. It is not something that can be forced upon someone the way communism is. Love is a decision and a response to the love we received from God through creation and through human beings. It is not the irresponsible acceptance of perversions of the human condition. So your viewpoints should be open to be presented. However, in love it is not anyone's responsibility to accept your viewpoints as worthwhile or as good. Discrimination is good, while prejudice is bad. It seems discriminating between good and bad is to liberals the gravest of sins. I guess for the godless it is the presentation and proof of truth and goodness which most infuriate them. I don't know their reasoning, but it seems the denial of all that is good and wholesome is the only road for those who deny God. Anything else would point them inevitably toward God, who is the source of all goodness, and since they hate him because they can't be him, they can only choose to be his opposite. Go figure. |
||||
|
||||
The crib is a simple way of remembering Christ, says PopeICN -- Vatican City -- Pope Benedict has encouraged Catholics to set up cribs as "a simple and eloquent way of remembering Christ". Speaking to pilgrims in St Peter's Square during his General Audience yesterday, the Holy Father said: "It is my hope that such an important element not only of our spirituality, but also of our culture and art, continues to be a simple and eloquent way of remembering Christ." Pope Benedict also urged Christians to defend the spirit of Christmas against secular trends. "False prophets continue to offer cheap salvation which ends up in deep delusions," he said. "It is the duty of Christians to spread through a witness of life the truth of Christmas, which Christ brings to every man and woman of good will." "Today many consider God irrelevant. Even believers sometimes seek tempting but illusory shortcuts to happiness. And yet perhaps even because of this confusion, humanity seeks a saviour, and awaits the coming of Christ," the Pope said. The Holy Father wished pilgrims a 'Happy Christmas' in seven languages. |
||||
|
||||
Recent Articles:
The Bishops Speak
Christmas Gift of Priestly Vocations Christian Joy: The Lord Is Its Source I Was in Prison and You Visited Me Christmas: The Beginning of Our Redemption >>See more The Bishops Speak articles December 25, 2006 In remarks to the faithful prior to praying the Angelus, Benedict XVI considered the figure of St. Joseph. Addressing thousands of pilgrims gathered in St. Peter's Square, the Pope recalled how the evangelist Matthew presents the saint as the model "of the 'just' man who, in perfect harmony with his wife, welcomes the Son of God-made-man, and watches over His human development." He added: "For this reason, in the days prior to Christmas, it is more important than ever to establish a kind of spiritual dialogue with St. Joseph, because he helps us to experience fully this great mystery of the faith." John Paul II was greatly devoted to St. Joseph, said the Holy Father, and left us a meditation dedicated to him in the Apostolic Exhortation Redemptoris Custos (Guardian of the Redeemer), in which the late Pope "particularly stressed the silence of St. Joseph; a silence permeated by contemplation of the mystery of God, in an attitude of complete openness to the divine will. In other words, St. Joseph's silence was not an expression of interior emptiness, but on the contrary, of the fullness of faith that he carried in his heart, and that guided his every thought and deed. "A silence through which Joseph, together with Mary, safeguarded the Word of God and continually compared it with the events of Jesus' life; a silence interwoven with constant prayer and with unreserved trust in Divine providence. It is no exaggeration to say that from His 'father' Joseph, Jesus learnt — at a human level — the vigorous interior life that is a premise of true justice, the 'superior justice' that one day He would teach His disciples." Benedict XVI concluded: "Let us allow ourselves to be 'infected' by St. Joseph's silence! We need it greatly, in a world that is often too noisy, that does not favor meditation or listening to the voice of God. During this period of preparation for Christmas, let us cultivate interior meditation, in order to welcome and safeguard Jesus in our lives." |
||||
| Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Range: |


